Research/ IN-SPACE SERVICING
Space Science and Technology Partnership Forum: Analysis for a Joint Demonstration of High Priority, In-Space Assembly Technology
Doris Hamill, Sharon A. Jefferies, Robert W. Moses, Frederic H. Stillwagen, Carie Mullins, Elaine Gresham
OpenAlexSpacecraft Design and Technology · Space exploration and regulation · Space Satellite Systems and ControlNTRSSpacecraft Design, Testing and Performance
The various U. S. government agencies that are pursuing in-space assembly technology have a common need to demonstrate technological capabilities on a space-based platform. Several of the agencies, and different mission developers within an agency, have independently begun planning such demonstrations. This paper reports on a study of how well the different planned platforms could support demonstrations of the agencies joint needs. The study first prioritized a comprehensive list of the needs for in-space assembly capabilities across the agencies against jointly agreed evaluation criteria. Each planned demonstration platform was characterized to a first order. The capability needs were qualitatively assessed against four figures of merit including their joint priority, and the platforms were assessed against five criteria to produce a quantitative weighting factor of reach capability need and each platform. A Quality Function Deployment (QFD) matrix was used to deploy the weighted capability needs against the weighted platforms capabilities. This first-order assessment showed that the platforms reflect a great deal of redundant capability without a strong reason to prefer one over the others. These results were largely insensitive to the details of the assumptions.\n